- If both users are in our system
- If at least one of the users in this ChatMessage is a local user
- If the recipient is not blocking the actor
+ - If the recipient is explicitly not accepting chat messages
"""
def validate_local_concern(cng) do
with actor_ap <- get_field(cng, :actor),
{_, %User{} = actor} <- {:find_actor, User.get_cached_by_ap_id(actor_ap)},
{_, %User{} = recipient} <-
{:find_recipient, User.get_cached_by_ap_id(get_field(cng, :to) |> hd())},
+ {_, false} <- {:not_accepting_chats?, recipient.accepts_chat_messages == false},
{_, false} <- {:blocking_actor?, User.blocks?(recipient, actor)},
{_, true} <- {:local?, Enum.any?([actor, recipient], & &1.local)} do
cng
cng
|> add_error(:actor, "actor is blocked by recipient")
+ {:not_accepting_chats?, true} ->
+ cng
+ |> add_error(:to, "recipient does not accept chat messages")
+
{:local?, false} ->
cng
|> add_error(:actor, "actor and recipient are both remote")
refute match?({:ok, _object, _meta}, ObjectValidator.validate(valid_chat_message, []))
end
+ test "does not validate if the recipient is not accepting chat messages", %{
+ valid_chat_message: valid_chat_message,
+ recipient: recipient
+ } do
+ recipient
+ |> Ecto.Changeset.change(%{accepts_chat_messages: false})
+ |> Pleroma.Repo.update!()
+
+ refute match?({:ok, _object, _meta}, ObjectValidator.validate(valid_chat_message, []))
+ end
+
test "does not validate if the actor or the recipient is not in our system", %{
valid_chat_message: valid_chat_message
} do