|> validate_local_concern()
end
- @doc "Validates if at least one of the users in this ChatMessage is a local user, otherwise we don't want the message in our system. It also validates the presence of both users in our system."
+ @doc """
+ Validates the following
+ - If both users are in our system
+ - If at least one of the users in this ChatMessage is a local user
+ - If the recipient is not blocking the actor
+ """
def validate_local_concern(cng) do
with actor_ap <- get_field(cng, :actor),
{_, %User{} = actor} <- {:find_actor, User.get_cached_by_ap_id(actor_ap)},
{_, %User{} = recipient} <-
{:find_recipient, User.get_cached_by_ap_id(get_field(cng, :to) |> hd())},
+ {_, false} <- {:blocking_actor?, User.blocks?(recipient, actor)},
{_, true} <- {:local?, Enum.any?([actor, recipient], & &1.local)} do
cng
else
+ {:blocking_actor?, true} ->
+ cng
+ |> add_error(:actor, "actor is blocked by recipient")
+
{:local?, false} ->
cng
|> add_error(:actor, "actor and recipient are both remote")
refute match?({:ok, _object, _meta}, ObjectValidator.validate(valid_chat_message, []))
end
+ test "does not validate if the recipient is blocking the actor", %{
+ valid_chat_message: valid_chat_message,
+ user: user,
+ recipient: recipient
+ } do
+ Pleroma.User.block(recipient, user)
+ refute match?({:ok, _object, _meta}, ObjectValidator.validate(valid_chat_message, []))
+ end
+
test "does not validate if the actor or the recipient is not in our system", %{
valid_chat_message: valid_chat_message
} do